Chopin at the Opera II

February 2, 2008

continued from yesterday

pauline-viardot-garcia_599109.jpg Chopin delighted in making the piano sing, and the vocal origins of his distinctive keyboard melody are key to understanding or performing his works. In Chopin’s mazurkas the traffic flows in the opposite direction, for they owed their first wide popularity to a singer, the celebrated Pauline Viardot (née García, pictured above), who set words to mazurkas and sang them in her recitals. Chopin complained that, once they became audience favorites, she stopped listing them in London playbills as “Mazurkas of Chopin” and began to call them “Mazurkas arranged by Mme Viardot.”

Such mazurkas occasioned some of Chopin’s most innovative harmonic adventures: Wagner is prefigured, and posterity is shown new tonal possibilities. It is appealing to picture the greatest Polish composer, now become the toast of cosmopolitan Paris, refreshing his repertory by retrieving and exploiting some of his earliest musical memories. For not only had parlor mazurkas been all the rage in the Warsaw of Chopin’s youth, but visits to village festivals had revealed to him the startling originality of the authentic folk mazurka. The highly individual charms of that rustic dance (characterized by strong secondary accents within a three-beat measure whose variety was far removed from the waltz’s predictability) were at his disposal whenever he wished to stir up his memories — memories that would call forth compositions that Western Europe understandably heard as markedly original. The mazurkas were sometimes deemed too inventive to be understood at first hearing.

A wise Chopin interpreter makes the most of the coloristic and rhythmic variety of the mazurka. But their painterly manner does not directly transfer to the large-scale canvas provided by the piano sonata, where a wider focus must be employed by performer and hearer. Chopin left three sonatas, and the world is a richer place for them; but that world has not usually considered them his most characteristic contributions. He erects a sustained musical experience upon the framework of a conventional multi-movement structure, with contents that are true to the developed Chopinesque vision but are not typical of it. What made the sonatas a departure for this composer was not the substantial length of the movements; the large-scale polonaises, scherzos and ballades had already established Chopin’s right to our attention over a long space of time. It is more that, by embarking upon a sonata, the composer seemed to stake a claim to the Beethovenian mantle that even the most distinguished salon pieces had been powerless to earn him.

There are those who would have denied Chopin that mantle. Even Schumann, whose idolatry of the Pole had sometimes been almost slavish, did not fully appreciate the sonatas (but he was also capable of missing their point so thoroughly that he recommended the excision of the famous Funeral March, as much the keystone of the B-Flat Minor Sonata as it was to become of processions at state funerals). But, if the hearer — or the performer — comes to Chopin for a new approach to the sonata ideal, rather than viewing Chopin through a Beethovenian lens, he will not go away disappointed. The sonatas provide another occasion for Chopin to be the most original artist for the piano that the repertory has ever known. They also provide a vivid refutation of the superficial criticism that finds Chopin’s art sentimental and insubstantial. An attentive student of his whole œuvre may, in fact, hear in it the fruits of Chopin’s lifelong study of Bach and Mozart. The sonatas are illuminating partly because they forgo picturesque features that help make Chopin’s other pieces accessible but that make it more difficult to hear them as “absolute” music.

Even on his deathbed, Chopin still preoccupied himself with song and with mazurkas. He called in a singer friend to sing one last song for him (evidently Stradella’s “Hymn to the Virgin”), he composed his last work (the Mazurka Op. 68, No. 4), and he affirmed his request that the Mozart Requiem be sung at his funeral. (Paris had last heard that music at obsequies for Napoleon.) The composer’s friends particularly wished to include women among the soloists (a violation of church law at the time); once permission had been secured, the great Viardot took her place in the Madeleine for one of the most unforgettable ceremonies of nineteenth-century Paris: the raising of immortal song to the memory of “the poet of the piano.”

3 Responses to “Chopin at the Opera II”

  1. […] 3, 2008 Having mentioned rôles that the great Pauline Viardot (1821–1910) played in Chopin’s story, it seems worthwhile to notice that Frederica von Stade (and who worthier?) has lately been […]

  2. […] bel canto singing on the piano manner of Chopin (the meters for this site reporting that this and this are two of the most-linked-to entries in the ten-month history of RogerEvansOnline), Anthony […]

  3. […] postings on this site. (Somebody must have linked to them somewhere.) They can be see here and here. I mention them again now because it struck me tonight that, whereas in the past a pianist might […]

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: